Comment on the statement" man is the part of nature and not the master of nature"
Answers
Explanation:
Man's role in nature seems to divide naturally in two parts: 1) the dispersal of Earth-Life into the galaxy; 2) the enhancement and development of the self-awareness and creativity of the Cosmos. Humanity is, in the first instance, the practical, scientific tool of Gaia, or Mother Earth, evolved as her reproductive agent; in the second instance, humanity is the perceptual or intellectual tool of the Cosmos, evolved to carry the information and self-awareness of the Cosmos, the agent by which the Cosmos explores, understands, and appreciates itself, including exploring new (including abstract) modes of creativity. Our native spiritual awareness appears to be our intuitive recognition of this cosmic connection. The first role is Earth-oriented, manifesting socially as Science; the second role is Universe-oriented, manifesting socially as Art and Religion, in all their forms. It should be obvious that the first role is in no way intrinsically at odds with the second.
Man is the part of nature and not the master of nature
Explanation:
- According to the proverb, Man is the part of nature and not the master of nature we can clearly define that man is just a part of nature as other organisms but nowadays man acts as the master of nature and damages nature.
- Man is killing nature directly or indirectly with their sense, education which other organisms lack.
- As per the rule of our planet man is the part of nature and have given some roles to play.
To learn more:
expand the idea we are part of nature not apart from it - Brainly.in
https://brainly.in/question/7153364
we are part of nature not apart from it expand the theme - Brainly.in
https://brainly.in/question/7062388