English, asked by keval365, 5 months ago

Common Content:
Texas based pathologist was (1) issuing reports under his signature without
(2). the condition of lab or biochemical tests prevents visiting. He is a
(3). breaker.The DMC registerer (4) him in 2016. This pathologist was
offering (5) to more than 30 labs but he visited only those labs that were
(6) new to his house. In (7) _investigation, it was reported that he never
visited labs which were far. Sometimes he just gives his (8)
on a scanned
report on the phone. All the labs have _(9) _signature of the pathologist that was
used to prepare the lab report. However, the pathologist claimed that his signature was
made (10)
__by certain labs, just to his good reputation.
He visited only those labs that were
new to his house.​

Answers

Answered by lallaallala
2

Answer:

jssvxjcemzgcn

Han,yj cu

Answered by DoctorStrange001
0

Answer:

Texas based pathologist was (supposedly) issuing reports under his signature without (overseeing) the condition of lab or biochemical tests prevents visiting. He is a (rule) breaker.The DMC registrar (debarred) him in 2016. This pathologist was offering (consultation) to more than 30 labs but he visited only those labs that were (literally) new to his house. In (additional) investigation, it was reported that he never

visited labs which were far. Sometimes he just gives his (views)

on a scanned report on the phone. All the labs have (copied) signature of the pathologist that was used to prepare the lab report. However, the pathologist claimed that his signature was made (deceitfully) by certain labs, just to his good reputation.

#SPJ3

Similar questions