Compare and contrast the limitations of the electronic theory of valency with hybridization?
Answers
The length of the bond and energies of the bond are much expected to be the same this occurs when covalent bond is formed between two or more atoms.
This is because covalent bond between the two atoms results in the mere sharing of the electrons.But when it is practically done it is basically observed that the bond lengths are not actually same.
Valence Bond Theory (VBT) takes as its primary performing artists the individual molecules and their own nuclear orbitals. To think about holding, it attempts to take a gander at the cover of the nuclear orbitals. As you can envision, in light of the fact that the essential building square of VB are free particles, it is best to portray atoms that are close separation or when iotas are scarcely close enough to relate, and the image of electrons being restricted around their individual molecules is a decent estimate.
Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT) takes a gander at the particle in general unit, and treats the electrons as delocalized and shared among every one of the molecules. The orbitals that MO endeavors to draw can cover the whole particle, and subsequently MO will in general give a superior picture of completely reinforced atoms and sub-atomic highlights like reverberation (where electrons are shared over various cores rather than limited like in VBT).