History, asked by ppp73, 5 months ago

compare and contrast the reign of Suleiman the magnificent and mehmet 2​

Answers

Answered by Tulishamp4
7

Answer:

Answer:I think Suleiman the Law Giver is not proper name for this comparison. When he became Sultan, Ottoman Empire was one in the greatest in the world. His Father filled Ottomas Treadury out after fight with Safevi's and Memluks. According to İlber Ortayli, he was good commander but did not pay attention to sceince. During Suleiman's time Piri Reis draw a world map but he is not supported by Suleiman. In my opinion, this is biggest difference between Suleiman and Mehmet II-Atatürk. Besides, Suleiman increased number of Sharia law in the Ottoman justice system. When Mehmet II conquer to İstanbul, he adopted Roman law and institute. Ataturk is persued to science as well. He accepted jewish scholars and tried to provide proper conditions in order to produce science and he made Turkey secular republic.

Answer:I think Suleiman the Law Giver is not proper name for this comparison. When he became Sultan, Ottoman Empire was one in the greatest in the world. His Father filled Ottomas Treadury out after fight with Safevi's and Memluks. According to İlber Ortayli, he was good commander but did not pay attention to sceince. During Suleiman's time Piri Reis draw a world map but he is not supported by Suleiman. In my opinion, this is biggest difference between Suleiman and Mehmet II-Atatürk. Besides, Suleiman increased number of Sharia law in the Ottoman justice system. When Mehmet II conquer to İstanbul, he adopted Roman law and institute. Ataturk is persued to science as well. He accepted jewish scholars and tried to provide proper conditions in order to produce science and he made Turkey secular republic.İn the light of the mentioned above, Suleiman should not be on the comparison due to obvious reasons.

Answer:I think Suleiman the Law Giver is not proper name for this comparison. When he became Sultan, Ottoman Empire was one in the greatest in the world. His Father filled Ottomas Treadury out after fight with Safevi's and Memluks. According to İlber Ortayli, he was good commander but did not pay attention to sceince. During Suleiman's time Piri Reis draw a world map but he is not supported by Suleiman. In my opinion, this is biggest difference between Suleiman and Mehmet II-Atatürk. Besides, Suleiman increased number of Sharia law in the Ottoman justice system. When Mehmet II conquer to İstanbul, he adopted Roman law and institute. Ataturk is persued to science as well. He accepted jewish scholars and tried to provide proper conditions in order to produce science and he made Turkey secular republic.İn the light of the mentioned above, Suleiman should not be on the comparison due to obvious reasons..

please mark me as branilist and follow me

Similar questions