History, asked by sunitamore8421, 7 months ago

Compare India’s Parliamentary form of Government with the Presidential form of

Government in the U.S.A. Which form of Government do you prefer, and why conclusion for project

Answers

Answered by Aadhyagupta2
0

Answer:

Arguments Against the Parliamentary System:

Unqualified Legislators: The parliamentary system has created unqualified legislators, who have sought election only in order to wield executive power.

It limits executive posts to those who are electable rather than to those who are able, e.g. the prime minister cannot appoint a cabinet of his choice; he has to cater to the wishes of the political leaders of several parties.

Powerful Executive: Most of the laws are drafted by the executive and parliamentary input into their formulation and passage is minimal. It has been seen that the ruling party issues a whip to its members in order to ensure unimpeded passage of a bill.

Since defiance of a whip itself attracts disqualification, MPs blindly vote as their party directs.

Hence, the parliamentary system does not permit the existence of a legislature distinct from the executive.

Fickle Legislative Majority: It has forced governments to concentrate less on governing than on staying in office, and obliged them to cater their coalitions.

Explanation:

hope it helps;

please mark as brainliest

Similar questions