Question

Compare indian and dutch forest act?

Answer 1

1.java was ruled by dutch whereas bastar was ruled by colonial goverment 2.in java teak wood trees were cut so that japanees should not use it but in bastar trees were cut for ships and sleepers for railways 3.in java bringing horse cattle etc in forest people need lisence but in bastar cattle grazing was itself banned

Answer 2

The Indian Forest Act was sanctioned by the British Government in 1865 as altered in 1878 lastly in 1927. India pronounced itself law based in 1947, till such time India was governed by the British and the ancestral individuals of India were for the most part ignored and dismissed.  

 Oblivious of the law, as they were, developments were limited for them inside the woodland obscure to them; their sustenance of employment confronted an undesirable tempest, and was in risk. The Act restricted their financial, socio-social and socio-religious life. They were in absolute terrify. The bleak circumstance was proceeding till the Indian freedom. In 1947, India pronounced itself as a Democratic, Socialist, Republic. The quality of popular government in a nation depends on its kin; the clans are an indivisible and basic piece of it.

Dutch forest acts are:

• The  Dutch  enacted  forest  laws  in  Java  restricting  people's  access to  forests.

• Wood  could  only  be  cut  for  specified   purposes  like  constructing  houses    and   making  river  boats.

•  Wood  could  be  taken  from  specific  forests  but  under  close  supervision.