Compare parmenides and heraclitus with indian phylosophy
Answers
Answered by
0
At the first sight Heraclitus and Parmenides uphold the opposite principles, with their doctrines being in dramatic contrast, while the former affirms change, becoming and cyclic recurrence of things and the latter denies their existence. For Heraclitus true being is circular and transforms into not-being, life turns into death and the change that occurs is eternal and cyclical, it truly is (Graham). While for Parmenides true being is motionless and static, it does not change behind the appearance of change. Both philosophers indirectly abolished death by stamping becoming with the seal of being (McFarlane).
Similar questions
Math,
8 months ago
English,
8 months ago
English,
8 months ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
Science,
1 year ago