Compare the evidence dna with the dna from the two suspects. Which suspect's dna pattern matches that generated from the evidence dna? Which suspect is linked to the crime? 1. 2. What is the purpose of the "no dna control"? Imagine that when you analyze your gel you see the same pattern of dna bands for the "no dna control" as you see for the "evidence from glass case." the lanes containing the two reactions are next to each other. Can you trust your results? Explain why or why not. 3. This lab simulates the analysis of just one str in the genome. Would this analysis be sufficient for a reliable identification in real life? If it is sufficient, explain why. If it is not, explain why not and what could be done using dna to identify someone more reliably
Answers
I think this is the answer the 2 give questions
if so pls don't forget to vote
Answer:
DNA fingerprinting or Profiling is used for analyzing the DNA of suspects to that from the crime scene.
Explanation:
1. To compare DNA collected from the crime scene, two suspect samples were collected, and then further process compares how the band pattern of one suspect matches the DNA collected from the crime scene.
2. The no control DNA has no template of DNA hence it prevents contamination.
No, the result cannot be trusted because no control DNA has no template thus there is no band formation in this line. Band formation in no control lane predicts the contamination.
3. One STR analysis is not enough there should be a combination of STRs because one STR could be common in two individuals and it can give the wrong results.
