Compare the parliamentary and presidential forms of Government with reference to India and USA.
Don't spam.....
Answers
But in the presidential form of government, there is only one head. As in USA, the president is the head of not only of the states, but also of the government. There is no strict separation of powers in the parliamentary form of government as in UK and India. The ministers are also the part of the legislature.
What are the differences between parliamentary and presidential form of government?
A key difference between presidential and parliamentary systems lies in the power to remove a chief executive or to dissolve the legislature. In parliamentary systems, the chief executive's term of office is directly linked to that of the legislature, while in presidential systems the terms are not linked.
Answer:
A Presidential system is also called a congressional system. It refers to a system of governance in which the President is the Chief Executive and is elected directly by the people. The head of the government thus exists separately from the legislature. It is a form of government where the three branches (legislature, executive and judiciary) exist separately and cannot dismiss or dissolve the other branch. While the legislature makes the laws, the President enforces them and it is the courts that are responsible for exercising judicial duties.
A Parliamentary form of democracy is also known as the Cabinet form of government or the ‘Responsible Government’. It refers to a system of governance in which the citizens elect representatives to the legislative Parliament. This Parliament is responsible to make the decisions and laws for the state. It is also directly answerable to the people.
Explanation:
please thank my all answers