Social Sciences, asked by Pakali206, 10 months ago

Compare the status of women of your state with that at the national level for the last ten years on the basis of education level employment

Answers

Answered by gungunjain32
2

Answer:

Explanation:PIP:

Reformers in India have worked since the late 19th century to abolish practices such as the patriarchal joint-family system, the structure of property ownership, early marriage, and the self-immolation of widows which have been detrimental to the development of women. As a result, independent India has taken steps to protect the rights and equality of women. In order to analyze the objective status of women, secondary data were used to make 1) interstate comparisons, 2) intrastate comparisons with the status of men, and 3) comparisons in relation to overall development. Data from the early 1980s were analyzed from the 14 states which had a population of 10 million or more. 7 variables describe educational status, 3 are employment indicators, 2 are health indicators, 3 are demographic indicators, and 13 represent various aspects of development. The taxonomic method designed by Polish mathematicians in 1952 was used to rank states on the basis of each of the indicators. This method allows the determination of homogeneous units in an n-dimensional space without using such statistical tools as regression, variance, and correlation. It was found that the status indicators resulted in similar rankings for males and females in many states, but that in some states (Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh) the health, employment, and educational status of women is low. These states also show a low ranking in overall development status, thus highlighting the direct link between the status of women and the level of development. This study leads to the question of whether women's status can be studied at the macro level using macro-level data. If this is possible, then the lack of significant differences found in the present study either indicates that the indicators chosen did not reveal the differences or that, in fact, no differences exist. The observed direct link between ranks of development and status, however, indicates that what was read as status differences are simply differences in levels of development. In depth studies which focus on the self-perceptions of status of men and women as compared with macro-level analyses will be necessary to answer this question.

hope this helps ....

do mark me as brainliest...

Answered by suramyaverma6
0

Answer:

hegirhmfbhgdchjk nfsjlkmded njdcbnnogw7obcskomb

Explanation:

hdehtdyghfturgxhvxgwysq54qutiokhhsts

Similar questions