Question

conclusion of national power in political science.​

Answer 1

Answer:

When all elements of national power are taken into consideration, the United States remains the world's leading state. No competitor is yet capable of matching the United States in all areas simultaneously. In the form of national power that matters most to alliances — military power — US ascendancy is unquestioned.

mark me as brainliest pls

Answer 2

Conclusion of national power in political science is written as follows:

• The capacity to convince others to take an action even when they don't want to is referred to as power in political circumstances. This can happen in one of two ways: either through conversation to get individuals to collaborate for reasons that are explained to them, or through intimidation, where people are forced to do something.

• In politics, decisions are carried out using power. When power stops being a tool for coercion, its role becomes most effective. In reality, as anything gains legitimacy, it gains authority, meaning that legitimacy is what gives authority its stability.

• In conclusion, political power is legitimated authority since it signifies acceptance by the state and its consent to rule over them, which is undeniably the power that politicians aspire to.

• When we discuss authority, we are not talking about heavenly authority. Earthly authority is based on international law, the size of one's armed force, or power that has been seized or granted by others. Spiritual authority cannot be attained through inheritance, wealth, or even reputation. God gives us spiritual authority, and it functions in accordance with His laws. Genuine authority, like an authority in the physical world, must have the ability to take action.
• A person who has worldly power but lacks the ability to carry it out is not truly exercising it. This one, in our opinion, is merely a formal leader with no real authority. For this reason, we must discuss both authority and power. This is due to the fact that someone in such a commanding position would have persuasive control over the state by simply being a figure in such a highly regarded position that some people would be compelled by the feeling of trust and respect they believed towards a person in such an esteemed position as that, as well as coercive control over the state by somewhat controlling certain systems, such as the police force.

#SPJ6