Question

conclusion of parliament

Answer 1

Explanation:

Conclusion of Parliament

The three pillars of our Parliament are the first President, the second Lok Sabha and the third Rajya Sabha. Lok Sabha is known as the Lower House and it is also known as the Popular House, while the Rajya Sabha is known as the Upper House. The maximum number of members in the Lok Sabha is 552 and the Rajya Sabha has 250 members. In the Lok Sabha, the President elects two Anglo-Indian members, while the state The President elects 12 Anglo-Indian members. In order to make any law in India, the proposal is first presented to the Parliament in the Lok Sabha or in the Rajya Sabha, after passing from any House, it is passed in the second house. And then the President signs it on, and then the law is passed on. I have implemented it after the passage. Under the Rypalika India is a democratic country where the election is going to lead the country by the people.

At present, some Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha members have forgotten their obligations. I only go to Parliament to spend time. It has been seen so many times that many members of Parliament enjoy low rates of breakfast and food available. But, when there is a debate about any law, it does not appear there, such behavior is very condemnatory. Therefore, members must discharge their duties. And honestly, in the Parliament, every issue that is in the interest of the nation should be debated, as well as forgetting the personal interests of the party and taking steps in national interest.

Answer 2

Explanation:

The Indian judiciary may view itself as the custodian of the constitution and act as the balance between the contending levels and powers of a complex array of public institutions. Eventually the composition of the judiciary and sustenance of the conditions of its endurance are formulated and given concrete shape by the Parliament. The Lok Sabha is the epicentre of Parliament, and its public presence has grown enormously over the years. It was not easy for India to opt for parliamentary democracy as there was no precedence. Recent literature on Indian politics has highlighted the rise of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) to prominence from the 1980s onwards. The tendency to assert pluralism or diversity cannot be seen as an attempt to promote a notion of nationalism distanced from individual rights or a post-modern tendency of de-centring of the nation or the consequence of the global turn of Indian polity.

Keywords: India, Parliament, judiciary, Lok Sabha, parliamentary democracy, politics, Other Backward Classes, pluralism, diversity, nationalism