Question

conclusion of the various approaches to study of the nature of Indian state?​

Answer 1

Answer:

Chapter 1 showed that we need to answer various theoretical questions in order to be able to make effective foreign policy choices in cases like relations with Iraq, North Korea, and China. Chapter 2 showed the different theories that would influence the policies a policy maker would choose in those cases. Chapter 3 laid out the naturalist view that IR and the social world can be studied in a way that is descriptively objective, ethically neutral, and capable of producing reliable predictions. Chapter 4 presented reflectivists’ opposition to naturalist claims that scholars can study IR in a way that has such scientific attributes. This chapter offers some guidelines about how to solve the disputes and some possible naturalist replies to the arguments of Chapter 4. In particular, it sketches a conventionalist metatheory.1 It is ultimately up to the reader to explore the various issues surrounding this question and to come to her or his own conclusions about which methods are best for which purposes.

Explanation:

hope it helps you

plzz mark me as ur brainliast ❤️❤️

plzz follow me ❤️❤️❤️

Answer 2

Answer:

Add your answer and earn points.

Add your answer and earn points.naTEA

Add your answer and earn points.naTEANaTEAAce

Add your answer and earn points.naTEANaTEAAceAnswer:

Add your answer and earn points.naTEANaTEAAceAnswer:Chapter 1 showed that we need to answer various theoretical questions in order to be able to make effective foreign policy choices in cases like relations with Iraq, North Korea, and China. Chapter 2 showed the different theories that would influence the policies a policy maker would choose in those cases. Chapter 3 laid out the naturalist view that IR and the social world can be studied in a way that is descriptively objective, ethically neutral, and capable of producing reliable predictions. Chapter 4 presented reflectivists’ opposition to naturalist claims that scholars can study IR in a way that has such scientific attributes. This chapter offers some guidelines about how to solve the disputes and some possible naturalist replies to the arguments of Chapter 4. In particular, it sketches a conventionalist metatheory.1 It is ultimately up to the reader to explore the various issues surrounding this question and to come to her or his own conclusions about which methods are best for which purposes.