Conclusion on the role of interpretation in understanding ancient indian history sources
Answers
reveal the importance of weapons and weaponry in ancient India from ... India. The study started with a brief account of the history of ... is focused on the Sanskrit sources on artilleries.
ANSWER:
Literary and archaeological are the two key sources which give proofs of ancient Indian history. The literary source comprise secular (eulogies, literature [epics, poetry, drama, compilations], histories), religious (Vedas), Sangam, scientific sources as well as foreign travelogues and accounts. Archaeological source comprises inscriptions (copper plates, epigraphic), coins, monuments, paintings and sculptors, and other archeological remains.
EXPLANATION:
Though there are numerous sources of ancient Indian history, it is often tough to determine what happened since very few sources can be construed unanimously, as each historian has a very different interpretation about what would have transpired in ancient India. The sources of ancient Indian history, as remarkable as they seem, are quite lacking to portray a synthetic depiction of India’s past.
The genuineness of accounts suffers much from the absence of exact dates. It is factual that later records gave us a few exciting dates and facts while previews of history have been arduously extracted from previous records; however, even the most fervent believer in them will not proclaim for a moment that they give us instances of a consistent, clear and sufficient historiography.