Social Sciences, asked by adilmohd9409, 11 months ago

Conclusion on the topic of Mahatma Gandhi struggle against colonialism a success

Answers

Answered by Tajeshsahu
1

Answer:

When Gandhi entered the Indian political scene he was well

established as a leader of the Indian community in South hca. There he

succeeded in welding the different sections of Indians into one and united

community. There also he had to deal with the British government. Still in

1915 he was impressed by the British sense of justice and believed that

the British would listen to Indian demands which were 'just'. At that time

he was ready to cooperate with the British government.

It was in 1915 that Gandhi entered the Indian political scene. It was

during this period that Gokhale predicted, "this man is going to play a

great part in the future history of India.. . ..There is something in him

which at once enchains the attention of the poor man and he establishes,

with a rapidity which is his own, his affinity, with the lowly and the

,,l distressed. . . . . .

It was the Indian National Congress which led the Inlan National

Movement. But it was only a middle-class organization without a mass

base at that time. It remained more as a forum for debate than as an

instrument of action. It was characterized by the ideology of Moderates

Explanation:

ftunder the leadership of Gopala Krishna Gokhale and the ideology of

Extremists under the leadership of Bal Gangadhar Tilak. They bequeathed

to Gandhi their views on the nature and method of protest in the colonial

state. Gandhi made a critical borrowing fiom them and continuously

improvised upon them to make the protest against the colonial regime

more effective.

The early Indian Nationalists had much faith in the British rule.

This made them follow the path of constitutionalism. Gandhi by the late

1920s lost all such faith and so he abandoned the path of

constitutionalism. He had much faith in the masses and he believed that

masses are the ultimate source of power. The constitutional method

adopted by the Congress during these years did not make the leaders of

the Congress feel the necessity of the mass support. The westernized elite

which controlled the Congress were not for mobilizations of the masses

yet. British repression made the Extremists methods ineffective. Colonial

power tried to seek the support of the Moderates with small concessions

and reforms. Masses remained largely inert with no part to play in the

m~vement.~ But Gandhian technique of non cooperation needed mass

participation for its success. His methods were not in tune with the

prevalent methods of the Congress. In stark contrast to the politics of the

early Congress which were accessible only to the highly educated and the

English speaking Gandhi's campaign incorporated all sections of the

population. He brought about qualitative changes in Indian politics by

changing the national movement from a middle class movement to a mass

movement. His style of politics bewildered some of the Congress leaders

of the time as well as the British government.

Gandhi constantly tried to broaden the mass base of the Indian

National Movement. He became successful in drawing the masses to the

political forefi-ont. This aspect of movement did not get much attention

from the historians.

The political strategy that Gandhi evolved was conditioned by and

suited to a semi-hegemonic state like colonial India. The British who took

India by force consolidated their in India by adopting some measures to

collaborate the native people. But the introduction of rule of law, western

education and representative institutions etc. they established their

legitimacy in India. Gandhi's effort was to erode this legitimacy by

withdrawing the consent of the masses to the colonial authority.

Similar questions