conclusion on world health organisation
Answers
Answer:
The global vision that has brought improved travel and trade and increased interdependency among countries also calls for a common vision of health around the world. All countries are vulnerable to the ever-present threats of infectious disease, outbreaks, and epidemics. At the same time, there are opportunities for shared innovation and universal purpose as many countries that suffer from similar disease burdens strive to develop best practices and strong health systems for their citizens.
Throughout this consensus study, the committee emphasized the need for a more holistic examination of problems and challenges in global health. Such an approach applies not only to issues of global health security but also to the external factors that influence health security, such as the building of general capacity in countries and the creation of strong societies that foster stability, healthy lifestyles, and accessible economic opportunities. Unless core capacities and strong health systems are developed around the world, the global risk of infectious disease will continue to threaten the health and security of the United States. Beyond the imperative of addressing infectious disease threats, it is necessary to understand the fundamental connection between health and economic prosperity. In addition to the economic costs of responding to infectious disease outbreaks, the increasing prevalence of chronic or noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) has negatively affected global economies—compromising societal gains in life expectancy, productivity, and overall quality of life (WEF, 2017).
Many countries currently face the dual burden of a rapid increase in NCDs, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer, and the continuing need to eliminate infectious diseases, such as malaria and tuberculosis (TB), in addition to the priority of reducing the burden of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). Moreover, some countries are considered to bear a triple burden, as traumatic injury has been found to be the second leading cause of premature death in young men after HIV/AIDS (Marquez and Farrington, 2013). Combined, these three disease burdens can stall the progress of a country's development and significantly affect its ability to become a strong trading partner or a business or travel destination. The cost of productivity losses associated with disability, unplanned absences, and increased accidents can be as much as 400 percent higher than the cost of treatment (WEF, 2010). Research also shows that investors are less likely to enter markets where the labor force suffers a heavy disease burden (Bloom et al., 2004). Human capital clearly contributes significantly to economic growth, and it follows that having a healthy population is critical for economic prosperity. This point has been demonstrated in recent years: between 2000 and 2011, 24 percent of income growth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) resulted from improvements in health (Jamison et al., 2013).
The root causes of all three of these health burdens are often linked by such underlying social factors as poverty, education, and location (Frenk and Gómez-Dantés, 2016; Marmot, 2005). This commonality suggests that methods for prevention are linked as well, and the tools used to prevent one burden can help to prevent the others, emphasizing the need for holistic examination of programs. Over the last few decades, the United States has demonstrated remarkable leadership in global health. Notable progress has been achieved by such initiatives as The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the President's Malaria Initiative (PMI), as well as the nation's commitment to such multilateral organizations as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund); Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; and, more recently, the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA). Similarly, progress has been achieved by efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR) at the national and international levels. Against the backdrop of an influential legacy on the global health stage, the new U.S. administration faces the choice of whether or not to ensure that the gains won with billions of U.S. dollars, years of dedication, and strong programs are sustained and poised for further growth
Answer:
Answer: The global vision that has brought improved travel and trade and increased interdependency among countries also calls for a common vision of health around the world. All countries are vulnerable to the ever-present threats of infectious disease, outbreaks, and epidemics.
pls mark me as brainliest