Consider the statement N2 and co are isoelectronic molecule but M-N2 complexes are much weaker compared to M-Co complexes. The correct explanation is
Co is better -donor than n2
The homo of co is slightly antibonding where as it is bonding in N2
N2 is poor acceptor
All of these
Answers
Answer:
so do you have any questions or need any further information please contact me at your earliest convenience so we can do do do do do so do we have to
Answer:
C0 is a better electron donor than N2.
Explanation:
To solve this question, we need to understand several things, such as isoelectronic molecules, coordinate complexes and weak and stong ligands.
1. An isoelectronic molecule refers to two molecules that have the same electronic structure and the same number of valence electrons present in their outermost orbitals.
2. A Coordinate complex consists of a central atom or ion, which is usually metallic and a surrounding array of bound molecules or ions.
3. The surrounding array of bound molecules and ions present in a coordinate complex are known as ligands.
Ligands can be weak or strong and they are distinguished by rules that we can get through the Crystal Field Theory.
CO is a better electron dono than N2 as the triple bond in N2 is a stronger bond than the double bond in C0. So CO being the weaker of the 2 while also having a lone pair of electrons is more eager to share/donate the Electrons to the central atom or ion.
Learn more about Crystal Field Theory
https://brainly.in/question/975885
Learn more about weak and strong ligands
https://brainly.in/question/1854343