∴Content Quality required∴
1) Math is a Topic under Science. Do you agree or not? If you agree/don't agree give explanation to your answer.
∴No Spam Answers Allowed∴
Answers
Answered by
0
HEY MY FRIEND U R ANSWER IS HERE
_____________________________
∆™ Maths is completely related to science the shapes of the object can be determined by science and also science gave birth to maths because the shapes and all are related to the atmospheric matter of the object moreover mathstextbook some time use scientifical terms in the books
π™ We study trigonometry were we see value of trigonometric ratios like sine,coses which are obtained by scientifical values
π™ The word sine was obtained by the waves like wise many terms are used to determine the mathematical values
♂♀ Maths is always proportional to science if science is there maths is there
● Everything like squares, triangles are by science
Conclusion-- Science is necessary for maths
____________________________
HOPE U UNDERSTAND☺☺
_____________________________
∆™ Maths is completely related to science the shapes of the object can be determined by science and also science gave birth to maths because the shapes and all are related to the atmospheric matter of the object moreover mathstextbook some time use scientifical terms in the books
π™ We study trigonometry were we see value of trigonometric ratios like sine,coses which are obtained by scientifical values
π™ The word sine was obtained by the waves like wise many terms are used to determine the mathematical values
♂♀ Maths is always proportional to science if science is there maths is there
● Everything like squares, triangles are by science
Conclusion-- Science is necessary for maths
____________________________
HOPE U UNDERSTAND☺☺
crystinia:
Please Provide More Explanation.
Answered by
0
hey miss
here is ur answer
▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶
Math is most definitely _not_ a science. In science, (we assume that) there is a set of rules (the fundamental laws of nature) in operation, and the task is to figure out what the rules are by observing the results that occur when the rules are followed. Basically, it's an attempt to reverse-engineer the machinery of the universe. In math, it's the other way around - we get to choose the rules, and the task is to discover the results of choosing any particular set of rules. There is a superficial similarity, which leads some people to confuse the two pursuits. In science, the way you test a theory is to codify it as a set of rules, and then explore the consequences of those rules - in effect, to predict what would happen if those rules were true. You do the same thing in math - and in fact, the way it's done in math serves as a model for the way it's done in science. But here is the big difference: In science, as soon as your predictions conflict with experimental data, you're done. You know that your rules are wrong, and you need to start putting together a new set. In math, this kind of conflict can't arise, because there is no necessary connection between any mathematical theory and the world. The way you 'test' a set of rules in math is see whether the results they produce are interesting enough to induce mathematicians to keep playing with them. We might summarize the situation this way: Science is the pursuit of _the_ correct description of _this_ particular world; whereas math is the pursuit of interesting descriptions of possible worlds. Whereas scientific theories are right or wrong, mathematical 'theories' are merely interesting or uninteresting.
▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶
I hope this helps
#Prem✌✴✌✴✌
here is ur answer
▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶
Math is most definitely _not_ a science. In science, (we assume that) there is a set of rules (the fundamental laws of nature) in operation, and the task is to figure out what the rules are by observing the results that occur when the rules are followed. Basically, it's an attempt to reverse-engineer the machinery of the universe. In math, it's the other way around - we get to choose the rules, and the task is to discover the results of choosing any particular set of rules. There is a superficial similarity, which leads some people to confuse the two pursuits. In science, the way you test a theory is to codify it as a set of rules, and then explore the consequences of those rules - in effect, to predict what would happen if those rules were true. You do the same thing in math - and in fact, the way it's done in math serves as a model for the way it's done in science. But here is the big difference: In science, as soon as your predictions conflict with experimental data, you're done. You know that your rules are wrong, and you need to start putting together a new set. In math, this kind of conflict can't arise, because there is no necessary connection between any mathematical theory and the world. The way you 'test' a set of rules in math is see whether the results they produce are interesting enough to induce mathematicians to keep playing with them. We might summarize the situation this way: Science is the pursuit of _the_ correct description of _this_ particular world; whereas math is the pursuit of interesting descriptions of possible worlds. Whereas scientific theories are right or wrong, mathematical 'theories' are merely interesting or uninteresting.
▶▶▶▶▶▶▶▶
I hope this helps
#Prem✌✴✌✴✌
Copied answer not tolerated.
uuuu.
Similar questions