English, asked by saibhuvi1994, 11 months ago

coolie mulkraj anand character analysis​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
2

Answer:

Explanation:

ANALYSIS OF THE CHARACTERS

3.2 Characterization

E.M. Forster (1879-1970) as a critic of novels is primarily known for

his division of characters into „flat‟ and „round‟. Forster‟s terms have  

70

a wide acceptance among critics. Forster in Abraham M.H (1993)

says:

“A flat character is built around a single idea or quality and is

presented without much detail, and therefore, can be fairly,

adequately described in a single phrase or sentence. A round

character is a complex in temperament and motivation and is

presented with subtle particularity; such a character therefore

is difficult to describe with any adequacy as a person in real

life, and like real person is capable of surprising us.” (p.24)

Edwin Muir in his book The Structure of the Novel (1928), remarks

that the characters in the novel are known for their unchanged ability

and completeness from the beginning itself. He argues in the defence

of unchanging characters that Forster calls „flats‟. Muir argues in

Dnyate Ramesh (1996):

“Why indeed should not characters be flat? The only answer to

this is that the present taste in criticism prefers round

characters. The taste of the next generation may prefer flat, for

all we know. (p.25)

The above statement suggests that it is the incorrigibility and

changelessness of the flat characters that constitute the stark reality in

the novel. Mary McCarthy (1962) underlines the story of flat

characters, while making the most significant although rather

controversial comment on Forster. She says:

71

“The principle of growth in human being is as real. Of course,

(though possibly not so common) as the principle of eternity or

inertia represented by the comic.” (p.74)

W.J. Harvey (1965) covers a wide range of characters and groups

them into different categories underlining their nature and purpose in

the novel. According to him, the most important are the protagonists.

The characters are known as background characters. The rustic

characters represent the voices of the community rather than

individualized traits. These characters are given a moment of intensity

and generally have anonymous existence. The fickle characters

certainly are more individualized than the background characters and

serve a specific function in the novel. Dnyate Ramesh (1996) says that

“flat‟‟ characters and have equally significant existence. He says:

“To suggest that one order of characterization is better than

another is folly. To realize that differences exist is the

beginning of wisdom.‟‟ (p.161)

The findings are greatly relevant in the context of Mulk Raj Anand‟s

characters. These views may be referred to the present study, and it is

here that one may think it essential to understand Anand‟s concept of

human characters since it has pervasive influence upon the entire

corpus of the writer‟s fiction and occupies the centripetal position in

Anand‟s novels.

Anand was one of the practising novelists whose ideas, personal

convictions and beliefs related to the overall styles of life have an  

72

unmistakable stamp of his creative art. With regard to Anand‟s notion

of characters in Untouchable and Coolie, he gives preface to social,

political and personal aspects of the human beings in his writing. He

underlines certain salient features of characters in his novels; the

characters are prototypes and moulds. The human race is cast in the

mould, which has a permanent existence. The personality alone

remains unchanged. The social aspects are reflected with the help of

characters. Having a good knowledge of the society and class

struggle, Anand himself had experienced evils of the untouchability

and social reality in his life. The method of characterization in his

novels provokes readers to think about the social, political and

religious approaches while studying his characters. It is the general

critical consensus that Anand is a remarkable socialist and a gifted

caricaturist of the downtrodden. It also registers a vivid note of dissent

on account of his unchanging, un-growing, and underdeveloped

characters, particularly the protagonists in his novels. Forster‟s term

„flat‟ seems to have become a stick for many to beat Anand‟s

characters.

Similar questions