English, asked by sakshirajgure70, 11 months ago

Counterview on media thrives on sensationalism

Answers

Answered by masterpiece42
23


Gone are the days when the Media would battle for communal harmony and democratic establishment in the societies across the border. It was quite popular and valued in the past as it would speak for least spoken and voice their concerns to the populace for smooth and democratic governance in the society. Factual journalism died down over the past few years due to exponential growth in the number of channels and Newspapers that eventually invited deadly competition amongst the media houses. And that is when an ethical journalism breathed its last. With putting an end to true journalism came along was the wave of sensational reporting, centralising its’ sole control in the hands of few ‘haves who operate the fourth estate of democracy the way they desire, to be specific, to influence the masses and earn the revenues out of obtuse coverage. It attracts the viewers in a large number, so is the revenue. To retain this figure and revenue, reporters are always on look out for the spicy ‘junk food news’ that is easily sold following day in a massive number.

The presumed goal of the media houses today is to sustain the viewership and provide the audiences with sensational stories that help them increase their advertising revenue. Hardly any news is objectified in the media today. And that is due to escalating influence of the corporate biggies who compel media to do as told by these few ‘haves.

Media giants have with intent fallen prey to this trifling coverage (Sensationalism). Only way to get rid of this mismanagement is to appoint the special censoring board that would strictly monitor the news being covered in the Media and act against those who don’t follow the stipulated norms

Answered by zerotohero
18

Gone are the days when the Media would fight for mutual amicability and fair foundation in the social orders over the fringe. It was very prominent and esteemed in the past as it would represent slightest talked and voice their worries to the masses for smooth and majority rule administration in the general public. Verifiable news coverage faded away in the course of recent years because of exponential development in the quantity of channels and Newspapers that in the long run welcomed savage rivalry among the media houses. Also, that is the point at which a moral news coverage inhaled its last. With putting a conclusion to genuine news coverage went along was the influx of shocking detailing, bringing together its sole control in the hands of couple of 'haves who work the fourth home of majority rules system the manner in which they want, to be explicit, to impact the majority and procure the incomes out of unfeeling inclusion. It pulls in the watchers in a huge number, so is the income. To hold this figure and income, journalists are dependably on pay special mind to the hot 'lousy nourishment news' that is effortlessly sold after day in a huge number.


Make it the Brainliest Answer :)


Similar questions