Crotically evaluate the social and human dimension to the notion of development
Answers
Answer:
interpretations of individual development have also had powerful social impacts, especially as we have learned more about human embryology and reproductive biology. for those who hold the strongest versions of the view that each individual organism begins from unformed material, the emphasis on epigenetic emergence of form suggests that investing in "nurture" will pay off. it is worth investing in parenting that requires time and energy because this can shape the developmental process. in contrast, those who accept the view that the organism has some clear defining point at which it begins as an individual, and that its form or individuality is in some important sense already set, see much less value in investing in trying to shape what develops. development in these cases is largely a matter of playing out the intrinsic causes. the dominant version of this interpretation maintains, of course, that heredity sets the individual's differentiation and that development is really just a matter of growth.
though no respectable scientist today would hold either of these extreme interpretations, there are strong preferences depending on whether the researcher is a genetic determinist or a proponent of developmental regulation. historically, we can find some supporters for almost any interpretation along the range of possibilities. the public's very deeply held views about individual as well as species development make it all the more important that we have a clear understanding of the historical, philosophical, and biological contexts for developmental ideas and that we understand the social implication.