Dabate on utilization of forests produces as livelihood is safeguard to nature conservation.(against)
Answers
All living beings are directly or indirectly dependent upon nature in someway or then other.
By nature, the significance is generally on all natural products that are mostly derived from trees, i.e. medicinal herbs, and other stuffs.
However the main problem is that, while we are constantly focusing on how to use and utilize nature based products, we do not concentrate on the environmental impact of deforestation at all.
We cut more and more trees and this leads to deforestation that further disturbs the ecological balance of nature.
So we need to safeguard cutting and felling of trees for various activities, even if it means to utilize forest produces for livelihood based activities.
Debate on the utilization of forests produces as livelihood is safeguard to nature conservation:
“Forests are the lungs of our planet” - A very good morning to the respected members of Jury and my dear batchmates. I will be speaking against the motion in the topic of Utilization of Forests produces as a livelihood to safeguard the natural conservation. We are always surrounded by greed. It is said that the more a human gets educated the more he becomes greedy.
We are always in the conquest of achieving something in our lives and setting in our comfort zones is all that we have been desiring for. We have been destroying forests at a ruthless rate and have not realized that what implications would this have on our day to day life. We have been destroying the forest and its resources for our needs and therefore have made ourselves prone to the destruction that it might cause.
However, if we utilize whatever we are producing from these forests our greed to need and acquire something from it would increase in an exponential rate and therefore destroying more than what we have already destroyed from deforestation and climatic impact.