Debate :animals are not should be in cage why?why not?
Answers
Answered by
0
because animals also having a freedon
akshat107:
ok then go to any zoo nearby ur home nd release a tiger or lion from the zoo
then lets see how he uses his freedom
freedom means animals leave on forest
please think
u never mentioned..... anyways be precise
ok
Answered by
4
Against the motion:Animals are not to be caged
I feel that animals are too much unprotected in today's cruel world where poachers have become a nightmare for them.When the animals are caged they can at least be prevented from being killed though they are prone to certain exploitations.Moreover captive breeding can be done to the animals that are caged.Many animals like tigers,when they hunt,kill much than required whereas when caged they shall only get the required food.Forests are also damaged during a forest fire as well as due to excessive forest clearing by humans.So keeping all these factors in mind I shall stick to this that animals are better when caged bcoz "Something is better than nothing "and they can at least get their life though it is sorrowful to see them loosing their freedoms.
Hope it helps:)
I feel that animals are too much unprotected in today's cruel world where poachers have become a nightmare for them.When the animals are caged they can at least be prevented from being killed though they are prone to certain exploitations.Moreover captive breeding can be done to the animals that are caged.Many animals like tigers,when they hunt,kill much than required whereas when caged they shall only get the required food.Forests are also damaged during a forest fire as well as due to excessive forest clearing by humans.So keeping all these factors in mind I shall stick to this that animals are better when caged bcoz "Something is better than nothing "and they can at least get their life though it is sorrowful to see them loosing their freedoms.
Hope it helps:)
Thanx for marking my answer brainliest
It's very useful ?thanks
Welcome☺
Similar questions