English, asked by MiniDoraemon, 1 year ago

Debate on "Do films cause social evils? "


maxxmmmmm: why u delete my answer ??

Answers

Answered by fiercespartan
40

Hey!!

Here is a collection of pros and cons I have thought of ...

Pro :

( 1 ) Films do cause social evils, many movies are now made for profit and income, in this process, they donot care about the moral values, disciplines and many more things which shows India what it is. They destruct our resemblence. Many movies posses violence which is too bad for kids watching, many teenager are in a state of confusion due to the excess release of harmones in the body, they do not know what is right and what is wrong, if they see the movies filled with violence, there can be many troubles, there has been an mass shooting in the United states, which was done by an Indian teenager. Every violent TV show increase a little bit of likelyhood of a child growing and behaving more aggresively, they wouldn't show any respect towards some one or towards something.

Con :

( 1 ) As you would say, teenagers are in a state of confusion, then , whose responsibility it is to show some guidance towards their children, teachers are parents, we couldn't blame the movies for all the mass shooting happening around us, many people are naive and parents will have to show the right path, guide them , it is not the fault of the movies, perhaps the fault of wrong parentalism.

Pro :

( 2 ) How can it be the fault of the parents and teachers ? Now - a - days , with the increase in technology the chlildren could watch anything in the gadgets givem, parents give these gadgets to seek information from their child, not to misuse it, we cannot blame technology, with out the current technology, we are nothing.

Pro :

( 3 ) Movies create false notions, in movies many sikhs are made fun of their turbans, their songs and their way of living, it is their tradition and no one has the rights to discriminate them, many blacks are shown as gangsters in may hollywood and tollywood movies, this doesnot mean every black is a gangster in real life, we cannot judges some one based on their color, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King jr, was a balck , they were very good and stole the heart of many people , they couldn't be called gangsters, the develoption of false notions in the movies create a huge impact of many people's lives.

Con :

( 2 ) In this case, it is not the fault of the movies, movies are a mode of entartainment, we used to have a radio, news papers and now with technology, movies and movie theatres are invented, many people donot take these movies to heart, it depends upon the people's mind on how they take it, there are many inspirational and biographic movies, then why don't people implement these thoughts? Some people do, and like wise, some people implement the false notions shown in the movies, so hence, it depends upon the mind and heart.

Pro :

( 4 ) Many movies cause false notions, and there are very less movies with inspiration in it , the film directors are people too, they why do they take these false notions and create movies on them, why can't they take these notions and create movies against them? As you said, depends on minds. This links to the first statement, made, they mainly operate for profits and donot care about the ethics.

Based on the given points, decide the decision

Hope my answer helps!

Thanks!

#PeaceOut

#FIERCE


Anonymous: Amazing answer bro :)
fiercespartan: thanks!
fiercespartan: Thanks alot!
rajqueen: plz delete my messages
rajqueen: moderator plz help me it's a big request
Answered by Anonymous
4
Yes, it does when it is done by a crew who is not having any social responsibility.

Not only films, even businessmen, doctors, engineers, govt. servants etc. all of them can do a favour of social evils or stop them. The choices is for each one of us to choose.

The kings and monarchs ruled but drinking water was made free now, we have to beg our kings, and dirty businessmen to get “clean” water after they pollute the rivers, doctors test our blood to see the level of disease rather than the district collector banning harmful chemicals entering the water.

List, greed and anger are the three gatways to the hell we are living in. While the places they haven't touched is still pure.

Similar questions