Question

Debate on scientific intervention is necessary to unearth buried mysteries in against of it

Answer 1

Answer:

$\huge\fcolorbox{blue}{pink}{hello}$

Good morning everyone present; I am going to speak on ‘scientific intervention is necessary to unearth buried mysteries’; and I am going to speak in favor of it.  

Science has the potential to solve all of man’s problems and challenges provided it is used rightly. Science is helping man discover the mysteries of the world. Through science man has been exploring deep space, planets, satellites, etc. Recently a space probe, Parker Solar Probe has been launched to know mysteries about the Sun; Spirit and Opportunity rovers on Mars have been helping NASA to unravel many mysteries related to the red planet; similarly Hubble Space Telescope helped NASA to unravel many mysteries that would have been impossible to be unraveled.  

Science has the equipment and knowhow to unearth buried mysteries underneath the earth. Advanced machines such as seismometers, sophisticated scanners, sensors, etc. can be used to unearth the buried mysteries. Depp earth robotic probes can be sent deep down into the bowels of the earth to collect data of the deep earth. Sending deep space probe missions are far easier than deep earth explorations as the temperature keeps increasing as one goes down the earth; so does the pressure increase. Besides digging deep into the earth requires enormous time, energy, and resources.  

In such a scenario only science and technology can help man. Hence, intervention of science is a must to know the mysteries hidden in deep earth.

$<marquee scrollamount=600></p><p>❤Spreeha❤$

Answer 2

Explanation:

For : The civilization we are in has come across a history of civilizations behind the current era . But our evolution has started from the past . So , if we have to know who we are . We have to find out who we were and scientific intervention is one of those which actually helps us to find out necessary aspects and unearth buried mysteries . By the scientific intervention , we can find out the tradition , and culture of our ancient people.

Against : History is relevant in our life , this is obvious but when our probabilistic future is just a step ahead of us and we can bring a change in that by making efforts , it's not more important to invest resources , time and work power on the past that is still can't not be fixed or changed by any scientific intervention .

Hindi explanination:-

के लिए: हम जिस सभ्यता में हैं, वह वर्तमान युग के पीछे की सभ्यताओं के इतिहास में आई है। लेकिन हमारा विकास अतीत से शुरू हुआ है। तो, अगर हमें यह जानना है कि हम कौन हैं। हमें यह पता लगाना होगा कि हम कौन थे और वैज्ञानिक हस्तक्षेप उनमें से एक है जो वास्तव में हमें आवश्यक पहलुओं का पता लगाने और दफन रहस्यों का पता लगाने में मदद करता है। वैज्ञानिक हस्तक्षेप से हम अपने प्राचीन लोगों की परंपरा और संस्कृति का पता लगा सकते हैं।

के खिलाफ: इतिहास हमारे जीवन में प्रासंगिक है, यह स्पष्ट है लेकिन जब हमारा संभाव्य भविष्य हमसे सिर्फ एक कदम आगे है और हम प्रयास करके उसमें बदलाव ला सकते हैं, तो संसाधनों, समय और कार्य शक्ति का निवेश करना अधिक महत्वपूर्ण नहीं है। अतीत जो अभी भी तय नहीं किया जा सकता है या किसी वैज्ञानिक हस्तक्षेप से बदला नहीं जा सकता है।