English, asked by ahyaanturk567, 1 month ago

decolonization of Indian mind by namwar singh​

Answers

Answered by anilradha36
2

Answer:

Decolonising the Indian Mind

Decolonising the Indian Mind Namvar Singh:

THE greatest event of world history in the twentieth century has been decolonisation. The

century may not have yet ended but the hegemony in literature of Europe and America has

certainly come to an end. At the centre of literary creation we have now not Europe and

America but the nations of Latin America, Africa and Asia. It is from these countries that works

which are creatively exciting and stimulating are coming out, and the initiative lies with the

writers of these countries. Whereas the writers of Latin America and Africa are mounting a

challenge to the literature of Europe and America in the very languages of Europe, it is mainly

in our own non-European languages that the writers of an Asian country like India are hastening

the process of decolonization.

While this process had started with the beginning of the century in Latin America,

Africa and Asia, it was accelerated after the Second World War. In order to annex this new

literary groundswell, the literary theorists of Europe and America have from time to time come

up with various theoretical formulations, calling it now "Commonwealth Literature", now

"New Literatures in English", and now "Post-colonial Literature." The newest such formulation

is "Third World Literature." In one sense, the concept of "Third World Literature" may be seen

as a new variation on Goethe's old concept of "World Literature", but it is not quite so innocent.

It is in fact but a devious device to maintain the hegemony of "First World Literature," and if

we look at it carefully, the formulation "Third World Literature" is nothing but neo-

"orientalism" of the post-colonial age. Apparently, in order to define themselves, Europe and

America still need some entity "other" than themselves. It is implicit in this Western conception

that the Third World too must need some "other" in order to define itself, and who could this

"other" be, of course, but the West! To my mind, this is the true perspective in which to evaluate

Indian Literature of the twentieth century.

Whether the issue is that of tradition and modernity, or of regional and national identity,

or the aesthetic one of experimentalism and the assimilation of indigenous forms, it is hardly

possible to look for a resolution except in the perspective of decolonization. Therefore, the very

first question to ask is; how aware and active are the Indian writers today so far as the process

of decolonization is concerned? Nor is this question one of mere academic interest, as is often

the case in our seminars and conferences.

hope it helps

pls mark me as Brainiliest

Similar questions