Social Sciences, asked by guptabishnu8, 10 months ago

deference between country with constitution and country without constitution​

Answers

Answered by SamikBiswa1911
1

Answer:

An uncodified constitution is a type of constitution where the fundamental rules often take the form of customs, usage, precedent and a variety of statutes and legal instruments. An understanding of the constitution is obtained through reading commentary by the judiciary, government committees or legal experts. In such a constitutional system, all these elements may be (or may not be) recognized by courts, legislators and the bureaucracy as binding upon government and limiting its powers. Such a framework is sometimes imprecisely called an "unwritten constitution"; however, all the elements of an uncodified constitution are typically written down in a variety of official documents, though not codified in a single document.

An uncodified constitution has the advantages of elasticity, adaptability and resilience. A significant disadvantage, however, is that controversies may arise due to different understandings of the usages and customs that form the fundamental provisions of the constitution.

A new condition or situation of government may be resolved by precedent or passing legislation.[1] Unlike a codified constitution, there are no special procedures for making a constitutional law and it will not be inherently superior to other legislation. A country with an uncodified constitution lacks a specific moment where the principles of its government were deliberately decided. Instead, these are allowed to evolve according to the political and social forces arising throughout its history.

When viewed as a whole system, the difference between a codified and uncodified constitution is one of degree. Any codified constitution will be overlaid with supplementary legislation and customary practice after a period of time.

Answered by yourhelpmate
0

Answer:

country with Constitution

peoples are bound together on belief that no one can exploit them

there are some rules which is equal to every citizen of a country

People has some rights in the form of fundamental means no one can trespass them..

They are free to move , choose , holding thoughts, expressed themselves etc

If they feel like they are exploiting by anyone then they can go in courts which works according to the rules mentioned in Constitution

country without Constitution

people are not bound together anyone can exploit each other without any fear

There are also some rules which made by monarchy not for public benefits but for benefits of their own as a priority

people has no rights means they can not raise their voice against monarch.

they are not free to move, choose, holding views, express themselves..

if they feel like they are exploiting by anyone then they are not able to go to monarch because no one is their to hearing them.

with regards

hope its help you

Similar questions