Question

democracy is not a favourable form of government . give three arguments in support of this statement.​

Answer 1

Answer:

(i) A democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable form of government.

(ii) Democracy improves the quality of decision making because a democratic decision always involves many persons, discussions and meetings.

(iii) In any society people are bound to have differences of opinions and interests. Democracy provides a method to deal with differences and conflicts.

Explanation:

here's your answer

please make me brainliest

Answer 2

ʊя ∀η﹩ẘεя. ∀яε..

нø℘ε ḯ⊥ нẘʟ℘﹩

More recently, democracy is criticized for not offering enough political stability. As governments are frequently elected on and off there tend to be frequent changes in the policies of democratic countries both domestically and internationally.

Criticism of democracy is grounded in democracy's purpose, process and outcomes. Since Classical antiquity and through the modern era, democracy has been associated with "rule of the people," "rule of the majority," and free selection or election either through direct participation or elected representation respectively, but has not been linked to a particular outcome.[1]

Political thinkers approach their critique of democracy from different perspectives. Many[who?] do not necessarily oppose democracy—"rule of the people"—but, rather, seek to expand or question its popular definition. In their work, they distinguish between democratic principles that are effectively implemented through undemocratic procedures; undemocratic principles that are implemented through democratic procedures; and variations of the same kind.

For instance, some critics of democracy would agree with Winston Churchill's famous remark, "No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."[2] While others, may be more prepared to describe existing democratic regimes as anything but "rule of the people."

Critics of democracy have tried to highlight democracy's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits by contrasting it with other forms of governments. They have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies[3] and democratic aristocracies;[4] they have identified fascist moments in modern democracies; they have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal;[5] while, yet others, have contrasted democracy with Nazism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

The most widely known critics of democracy include Plato and the authors of the Federalist Papers, who were interested in establishing a representative democracy in America instead of a direct democracy.

ღ∀яḱ ḯ⊥..