Democratic government is better than military government
Answers
Answer:
In a democracy the people choose their leaders in elections in which the candidates state their views and the people choose a leader and representative who shares their values and ideals.
In a military Government, some General rules with his ideals and values and usually doesn’t give a darn what the people think or want.
Answer:
The U.S. is not a democratic government, much as aliens, both domestic and foreign, claim. It is a republic under the rule of law. Many U.S. laws create complicated, interconnected means of selecting elected and appointed officials so as to prevent 1 person 1 vote consequences.
For example, a Wyoming Senator has equal vote in Senate decisions, yet represents fewer citizens than a California Senator. It makes no sense for California residents to move to Wyoming for more Senate power, as the power ratio could consequentially reverse.
By all means, a military regime can be better than majority rule. The military leaders could create a government founded on a written proposition for personal discipline so as to encourage responsible human independence of by and for willing fellow citizens. They could issue statutory laws with institutions for domestic enforcement and amenability by the responsibly independent citizens when injustice is discovered. The body of law could guarantee fellow citizens the opportunity to develop individual and collective integrity with religion held to be a private pursuit by believers. In other words, separation of church from state would be the individual citizens’ responsibility. The consequences might be an achievable better future.
Without defining the military-imposed constitution that encourages responsible human independence, I hope I have suggested that a civically, civilly, and regally responsible military regime could originate a successful republic.