Describe a scenario where oral communication is most effective as compared to written.
Answers
Instant communication:
Oral communication is more effective when it is needed to communicate with someone instantly. When the receiver does not comprehend a message, he or she can inquire for explanation accurate away.
A detailed explanation of policies:
If any direction of managers and policy or procedure of the company requires explanation, oral communication is the best way to communicate. If any instruction or process of doing a work needs more conversation, oral communication will be the best serve the purpose.
Developing a direct relationship:
If it is important to establish a direct relationship between sender and receiver, or between workers and management, they should communicate orally. When a communicator wishes to contact straight with the communicate, in that case oral communication is more cooperative.
Maintaining secrecy:
Oral communication is best suited when information is to be kept secret. In this communication, the contents of the meaning can be reserved restricted between the sender and the receiver of the message. Apart from these two persons, no one can’t recognize the message. Moreover, the messages are not reserved in a record, so no trouble of losing any message. Written communication leaks secrecy as the message passes from hand to hand.
Instant response:
Where instant reply from the receiver is required, oral communication is the best suited there. For efficient communication, response is an obligation. If any reply needs to be known instantly, it can be done enhanced throughout oral communication.