Question

Describe a time when you had to solve a problem, but didn’t have all necessary information about it in hand. What did you do? its of moral science please give answer fast​

Answer 1

Hope it helps! Please mark me the brainliest if you think i am good enough!

This answer contains 2 diffrent answers from diffrent sources. I am not responsible for them.

1st Answer :

There are two possible situation. 1. When the problem is not completely defined 2. The problem is clearly defined. In first case which is what we encounter real life, when we solve the problem based on existing understanding, we will end up with another problem. So we should ask 5 time why a problem occurs. Only then we come to the real problem. For example why a place is dirty. In the first cut it is not cleaned. Second question- why is it not cleaned. Answer: Even if it is cleaned, it again becomes dirty. Third question- why it becomes dirty - people lack civic sense. Fourth question - here again we may branch two questions and so on. In another case say the problem is clear, if we do not have all facts, we can not use deductive technique to solve it. It is like looking for n unknowns with n-k equations. In that case we need to apply inductive technique - try out solution 1, then solution 2, then 3 and see if you can keep on minimizing the error to arrive at the most accurate answer. In case a problem is inter-play of 2–3 conflicting requirements. Generally satisfy the most important constraint and then redefine the problem. This works in real life because you can not be stuck with any problem for too long. You have to move on.

2nd Answer :

I was in 9th standard and 14 years old i had to help my mum to open her bank account, it was me bcoz i had no one else to do that for me but the people in bank they kept telling me for days that there is this or that problem and as i was a immature person i couldnt deal with it, I had no power nor knowledge but yet i knew that they were fooling around, thinking that i was a kid and yuppp i was but still i tried to dress up myself as a college student but still…

NOTE : THESE ANSWERS ARE NOT MINE

Answer 2

"Behavioral science" is a word I have never seen before.

• This question is based on the meaning of the word.
• If natural science is the science of nature, we can probably define "moral science" as moral or ethical science.
• That is, as a result of this discussion.
• If I do not fully understand the question, my answer will no doubt be invalid.
• Behavioral science may refer to various forms of ethical naturalism that support morality in the rational, powerful assumptions of the natural world.
• It is sometimes assumed that a scientific method is used to determine what is right and wrong, in contrast with the widespread belief that “science has nothing to say on the subject of human values”.
• Behavioral science teaches us the values ​​that live by us throughout our lives.
• Growing up with certain moral values ​​does not allow us to engage in wrongdoing because our knowledge does not allow us to pursue a wrong course.
• In today's world of technological advancement, we are morally bankrupt.
• Teaching moral science is an hour-long need to reduce stress.
• Social science and/or philosophy.
• ‘Kids may still have ethics classes, MBA courses in business ethics, but few people believe that any of these classroom teachings has anything important in everyday life.’.
• Behavioral science teaches you moral values.
• It teaches you the techniques and behaviors you need to follow in order to meet and be alone in the community to maintain your relationship.
• Especially laws and procedures that reflect social justice.