Describe James mill's periodization of Indian history. Why was it unacceptable to the historians of Independent India? On what basis have they periodically Indian history?
Answers
Answered by
4
HEY BUDDY HERE IS UR ANSWER______________________❤️❤️
The Problem with the periodization of Indian history by James mill was that he divided the Indian society in 3 ways :-________
1. Hindu
________
2. Muslim
_________
3. British
__________
However , this suggested that no other major changes took place in the history of India.
other than the religious ones_______
THUS, THE INDIAN SCOLAR CLASSIFIED INDIAN HISTORY INTO ___________
1. Antient
2. Medivial
3. Modern
hope helps ☺️☺️☺️☺️
The Problem with the periodization of Indian history by James mill was that he divided the Indian society in 3 ways :-________
1. Hindu
________
2. Muslim
_________
3. British
__________
However , this suggested that no other major changes took place in the history of India.
other than the religious ones_______
THUS, THE INDIAN SCOLAR CLASSIFIED INDIAN HISTORY INTO ___________
1. Antient
2. Medivial
3. Modern
hope helps ☺️☺️☺️☺️
Answered by
3
Answer :
James mill divided Indian history into Hinduism and Muslim and British periods.
This periodisation is based on the religious line that there was a face for which the Hindu were the rulers and other work ruled.
Then came the face of the Muslims and Britishers i.e. Christians. He had a colonial mind and thought asians to have poorly civilized. He felt Europeans to be superior.
So , infact, through this periodisation he tried to divide the people with their own specific identity which was not a correct.
During the Muslim and British they were were thousands of Hindu and Muslim princely states.
So , this is not a proper periodisation of Indian history.
Thank You!
Similar questions