History, asked by babyshark19508, 1 month ago

describe the lives of the indigo factory workers under British rule​

Answers

Answered by SABARISHkkarthick
0

Answer:



On 12 August 1765, the Mughal emperor appointed the East India

Company as the Diwan of Bengal. The actual event most probably

took place in Robert Clive’s tent, with a few Englishmen and

Indians as witnesses. But in the painting above, the event is

shown as a majestic occasion, taking place in a grand setting.

The painter was commissioned by Clive to record the memorable

events in Clive’s life. The grant of Diwani clearly was one such

event in British imagination.

As Diwan, the Company became the chief financial

administrator of the territory under its control. Now it had to

think of administering the land and organising its revenue

resources. This had to be done in a way that could yield enough

revenue to meet the growing expenses of the company. A trading

company had also to ensure that it could buy the products it

needed and sell what it wanted.

 

2018-19

27

Over the years the Company also learnt that it had to

move with some caution. Being an alien power, it needed

to pacify those who in the past had ruled the countryside,

and enjoyed authority and prestige. Those who had held

local power had to be controlled but they could not be

entirely eliminated.

How was this to be done? In this chapter we will see

how the Company came to colonise the countryside, organise

revenue resources, redefine the rights of people, and produce

the crops it wanted.

Revenue for the Company

The Company had become the Diwan, but it still saw itself

primarily as a trader. It wanted a large revenue income but

was unwilling to set up any regular system of assessment

and collection. The effort was to increase the revenue as much

as it could and buy fine cotton and silk cloth as cheaply as

possible. Within five years the value of goods bought by the

Company in Bengal doubled. Before 1865, the Company had

purchased goods in India by importing gold and silver from

Britain. Now the revenue collected in Bengal could finance

the purchase of goods for export.

Soon it was clear that the Bengal economy was facing

a deep crisis. Artisans were deserting villages since they

were being forced to sell their goods to the Company at low

prices. Peasants were unable to pay the dues that were being

demanded from them. Artisanal production was in decline,

and agricultural cultivation showed signs of collapse. Then

in 1770 a terrible famine killed ten million people in Bengal.

About one-third of the population was wiped out.

RULING THE COUNTRYSIDE

Fig. 2 – A weekly market

in Murshidabad in Bengal

Peasants and artisans

from rural areas regularly

came to these weekly

markets (haats) to sell

their goods and buy what

they needed. These markets

were badly affected during

times of economic crisis.

2018-19

28 OUR PASTS – III

The need to improve agriculture

If the economy was in ruins, could the Company be

certain of its revenue income? Most Company officials

began to feel that investment in land had to be

encouraged and agriculture had to be improved.

How was this to be done? After two decades of debate

on the question, the Company finally introduced the

Permanent Settlement in 1793. By the terms of the

settlement, the rajas and taluqdars were recognised

as zamindars. They were asked to collect rent from

the peasants and pay revenue to the Company. The

amount to be paid was fixed permanently, that is, it

was not to be increased ever in future. It was felt that

this would ensure a regular flow of revenue into the

Company’s coffers and at the same time encourage

the zamindars to invest in improving the land. Since

the revenue demand of the state would not be

increased, the zamindar would benefit from increased

production from the land.

The problem

The Permanent Settlement, however, created problems.

Company officials soon discovered that the zamindars

were in fact not investing in the improvement of land.

The revenue that had been fixed was so high that the

zamindars found it difficult to pay. Anyone who failed to

pay the revenue lost his zamindari. Numerous zamindaris

were sold off at auctions organised by the Company.

By the first decade of the nineteenth century the

situation changed. The prices in the market rose and

cultivation slowly expanded. This meant an increase in

the income of the zamindars but no gain for the

Company since it could not increase a revenue demand

that had been fixed permanently

Even then the zamindars did not have an interest in

improving the land. Some had lost their lands in the

earlier years of the settlement; others now saw the

possibility of earning without the trouble and risk of

investment. As long as the zamindars could give out the

land to tenants and get rent, they were not interested in

improving the land

Explanation:

◦•●◉✿ H⋆O⋆P⋆E⋆ ⋆i⋆t⋆ ⋆H⋆E⋆L⋆P⋆S⋆ ⋆y⋆o⋆u⋆.⋆.⋆ ⋆m⋆a⋆r⋆k⋆ ⋆m⋆e⋆ ⋆a⋆s⋆ ⋆b⋆r⋆a⋆i⋆n⋆l⋆i⋆e⋆s⋆t ✿◉●•◦

Answered by tanaysarkarsnehi
0

They were heavilty taxed and forced to look at the production of Indigo only. Not producer-friendly as the British forced them to sell it at a very low price. They weren't tortured or brutally treated by the British though.

Similar questions