despite being democratically elected the government of Zimbabwe cannot be called a true democracy write 5 reason to justify the statement
Answers
Answered by
3
Zimbabwe is not viewed as a vote based nation since it has a mono-part system where decisions are constantly won by ZANU. The Zimbabwe African National Union was an aggressor association that battled against the white minority government in Rhodesia, shaped as a part of the Zimbabwe African People's Union (ZAPU).
ZANU won the 1980 decisions under the authority of Robert Mugabe, and after seven years converged with Joshua Nkomo's ZAPU to frame ZANU-PF
Ever since Zimbabwe attained independence from white minority rule in 1980, it has been ruled by Zimbabwe African National Union - Patriotic Front (ZANU - PF) led by its leader Robert Mugabe. In all the elections held since independence this party has always been the winner. In fact, in spite of his popularity Mugabe uses unfair practices in the elections. The constitution of the country has been amended several times by his government to make the president more and more powerful but less accountable towards the country and its citizens. Public protests in the country have been declared illegal. Television and radio are controlled by the Mugabe Government. Opposition party leaders are harassed. Journalists of newspapers are harassed who write against the government. The government has ignored even court decisions which went against the government on different occasions.
Popular governments can be undemocratic and popular leaders can be autocratic. Zimbabwe and Robert Mugabe are clear examples of this. Although, the elections are held regularly in Zimbabwe but regular elections are not a guarantee for a democracy. Elections should be held regularly and fair, so that citizens can change the rulers in case they are not satisfied with their performance.
Hence, Zimbabwe cannot be called a democracy.
ZANU won the 1980 decisions under the authority of Robert Mugabe, and after seven years converged with Joshua Nkomo's ZAPU to frame ZANU-PF
Ever since Zimbabwe attained independence from white minority rule in 1980, it has been ruled by Zimbabwe African National Union - Patriotic Front (ZANU - PF) led by its leader Robert Mugabe. In all the elections held since independence this party has always been the winner. In fact, in spite of his popularity Mugabe uses unfair practices in the elections. The constitution of the country has been amended several times by his government to make the president more and more powerful but less accountable towards the country and its citizens. Public protests in the country have been declared illegal. Television and radio are controlled by the Mugabe Government. Opposition party leaders are harassed. Journalists of newspapers are harassed who write against the government. The government has ignored even court decisions which went against the government on different occasions.
Popular governments can be undemocratic and popular leaders can be autocratic. Zimbabwe and Robert Mugabe are clear examples of this. Although, the elections are held regularly in Zimbabwe but regular elections are not a guarantee for a democracy. Elections should be held regularly and fair, so that citizens can change the rulers in case they are not satisfied with their performance.
Hence, Zimbabwe cannot be called a democracy.
Similar questions