Question

Despite promising signs that lack of human activity during times of lockdown had led to flourishing wildlife across the world, loss of income is causing some people to exploit the environment. Evaluate this statement.

Answer 1

Answer:

so that's a great question despite promising science that lack of human activity during times of lockdown has led to flourishing wildlife across the world loss of income is causing some people to exploit the environment evaluate this statement so I am going to answer this question in the explanation part given below.

Explanation:so that's true during these times of lockdown people has led to explore their environment and flushing wildlife across the world that is due to the reason people are getting bored in the signs of lockdown and they are not taking care of any of the environment and the wildlife species of the world they don't think that they are gone extinct soon but they are still flourishing the wildlife across the world and causing exploitation for the environment thank you

Answer 2

Yes, despite promising signs that lack of human activity during times of lockdown had led to flourishing wildlife across the world, loss of income is causing some people to exploit the environment.

Explanation:

• In the coronavirus pandemic, there are not several bright points but one was the noticeable "return" of "nature" by the reduction of the frantic speed of modern life. Unfortunately, this is just a incomplete image & one confined to the small world of developed nations. In "low-income" nations countries & developing markets ,where most of the planet's biodiversity is contained,  the environmental implications of the pandemic can be catastrophic to the natural environment.
• The distinction lies in the way citizens react to their "economic shock". "Social insurance networks" are a standard feature in several developed countries where they protect the weak & the marginalized and the value of the "welfare state" has never been more evident than in the time of the pandemic. However people of several low-income nations still do not have their govts' assistance, which leaves them particularly insecure. The forest & the ocean provide a "protective net" for them in such case.
• The only choice for the weak & destitute is always to exploit natural resources. Animals fish, birds & and forest trees are "rarely owned"  by someone and are challenging to managing in rural areas. However, the "policing" of  of them also entails "technological hurdles". As such people will still find something they can consume or sell from environment  if they are left without food.
• The coronavirus pandemic is of course, at least in the near term, a far bigger danger to "livelihoods than climate change". There have been millions of unemployed workers. None ever knows what effects this "unprecedented exodus"  would bring, however, it is evident that much more people would be "poorer" & "hungrier"  closer to exploiting the environment to meet their needs.
• Moreover, the "management & surveillance"  of our precious environment  is considerably weakened. Govts  are pre-occupied with "public health necessity", as such is "less law enforcement" in several rural areas.. Furthermore, the closure of "global tourism" forced thousands of conservation areas out of the "financial blanket", "leaving "with little "operational budget" to track "poaching and other avtivities". 
• Worse still, a long-term reduction in tourism income could dramatically alter opportunities for those residing near the wildlife. "Millions" of humans "coexist" with the animals at the "boundaries of forests and reserves". Wild animals will invade fields, harass sheep, and even destroy humans, and they sometimes do that. "Tourism revenues" could "offset" some of the costs incurred by local residents and include a conservation incentive, however this precarious "co-existence" cannot survive if tourists stay away.
• Hence, whereas the "newly enriched" biodiversity in the time of pandemic crisis is reveling in these bleak days and informing us of the resistance of nature, a economic downturn does not preserve the "world's biodiversity".

To know more

Three explanations why a pandemic such as Covid 19 could be ...

https://brainly.in/question/18962692