Development for one may be the destruction for other. Do you agree with the statement? Justify your answer.
Answers
It is true that development for one may not be development for the other.
(i) More wages means development for a worker, but it can go against the entrepreneur.
(ii) A rich farmer or trader wants to sell food grains at a higher price but a poor worker wants to purchase it for low prices.
(iii) Construction of a dam means more and cheap power, but people, who will lose their habitat will demonstrate.
(iv) To get more electricity, the industrialists may want more dams. But this may submerge the agricultural land, and disrupt the lives of the people.
development of one may be destruction for others. this statement is true.
FOR EXAMPLE- a builder took a contract of constructing a dam over a river. the river provided water for irrigation to the farmers there. but, now due to the construction of the dam, the farmers living there will not be getting sufficient water for irrigation. and also, a major landmass will be occupied for the construction of the dam.
therefore, by this example, it has been shown that construction of the dam was development for the builders but destruction for the farmers.
hope it helps u
mark it as brainliest