Did the police officer have sufficient evidence to convict Aksionov ?
answer in three or four marks
Answers
Answer:
Did the police officer have sufficient evidence to convict Aksionov? Yes, the blood-stained knife was found in Aksionov's bag. When interrogated, he turned pale and started shivering. He did not have much to say to prove his innocence. Thus, the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to convict Aksionov.
Did the police officer have sufficient evidence to convict Aksionov? Yes, the blood-stained knife was found in Aksionov's bag. When interrogated, he turned pale and started shivering. He did not have much to say to prove his innocence. Thus, the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to convict Aksionov.
Answer:
Yes, the blood-stained knife was found in Aksionov's bag. When interrogated, he turned pale and started shivering. He did not have much to say to prove his innocence. Thus, the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to convict Aksionov.
Explanation:
hope it helps you
good evening