Difference b/w Belgium and Srilanka?
Answers
Belgium
1.They adopted a policy of power sharing.
2. They gave equal powers to all communities.. minor or major doesn’t matter
3.It solved the problem.
SriLanka
1)They adopted a policy of Majoritarioism.
2) They gave preferences to the majority Sinhala group alone, disregarding the minority
3). It only increased the problem
Answer:
Hi mate here is ur answer
Story of Belgium
1-Belgium is a European country with a population of a little over one crore. In this country, the ethnic composition is complex.
2-the total population, 59 percent lives in the Flemish region and speaks the Dutch language.
3-- Another 40 percent people live in the Wallonia region and speak French. Remaining one percent of the Belgians speak German.
Another 40 percent people live in the Wallonia region and speak French. Remaining one percent of the Belgians speak German.In the capital city, Brussels, 80 percent people speak French while 20 percent are Dutch speaking.
4--- The French-speaking minority community was relatively rich and powerful. This made the Dutch-speaking community angry.
5----From the 1950s to 1960s, there were tensions between the two communities because of these differences.
From the 1950s to 1960s, there were tensions between the two communities because of these differences.The Story of Sri Lanka
1----Sri Lanka is located south of India. This island nation has a diverse population of two crore people.
2---- In Sri Lanka, the major social groups are the Sinhala-speakers (74 percent) and the Tamil-speakers (18 percent). Tamils in Sri Lanka were divided into two groups:
3--Sri Lankan Tamils (13 percent) – Tamil natives of the country
4----Indian Tamils (5 percent) – came from India during the colonial period as plantation workers
5---Sinhala-speaking people are mainly Buddhists while the Tamil speaking people were either Hindus or Muslims. There was even 7 percent Christians, who are both Tamil and Si