Question

Difference b/w Prudential and Moral reasons.
❌NO COPY-PASTE FROM GOOGLE❌​

Answer 1

Prudential reason states that power sharing will bring out better outcomes. Power sharing is necessary as it helps to diminish the possibility of conflict between the various social groups. Social conflict often leads to violence and political instability and so power sharing is a good way to guarantee

political stability.

Moral reasons emphasize on the fact that power sharing itself is very important. Power sharing is the fundamental spirit of democracy. There should be a link between the ruler and the ruled, the law makers, and those affected by the laws.

Answer 2

Here is your answer mate...✔✔✌✌

Difference b/w Prudential and Moral reasons.

When power is shared among many social groups, it helps in the minimizing of social conflicts. It is expected that the rule of majority, with some concessions given to the minority communities, can help in politically stabilising the country. This is called the prudential power sharing.

When people and the government of the country realise that the feelings and interests of all the communities of the nation should be respected and taken into account, then it is known as moral power sharing.