Political Science, asked by mohhammadfaizahmed, 1 month ago

difference between an archeaologist and a historian​

Answers

Answered by nt1224696
2

Answer:

The difference between these two disciplines derives from the source materials: historians use written sources while archaeologists concentrate on physical remains. ... Archaeology is challenging results made by the historical research.

Answered by Anonymous
4

difference between an archeaologist and a historian are :-

1)Historian studies history, whereas archaeologist takes archaeology as a profession.

2)A historian takes information from the documented records and evidence; on the other hand, archaeologists study based upon physical events.

3)A historian does not have fieldwork; conversely, an archaeologist has to do work in the field.

4)The historian does not need to travel the cites to take information; on the flip side, archaeologist needs traveling to collect data.

Similar questions