Difference between analysis and interpretation of data in research
Answers
Answered by
13
Data analysis ans interpretation is done during the performance measure phase of the design unit or model. Performance measure leads to a typical procedure through which observations are made. Analysis is done on observed data to identify the trend or pattern. This trend or pattern gives useful information about the design or system. The trend identified will give the relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable during the performance measure. The trend or pattern gives a way to compare variables and also seek the difference between variables. The analysis phase of the performance measure predicts the outcome and associates logical relationships.
Predicting the outcome, observing the output response ans associating meaning to that output is known as interpretation. Interpretation is making the numerical data (numbers) speak. Giving importance to language spoken by the numbers and providing appropriate and sufficient is useful during performance measure.
During performance measure if comparison is made, one can identify the similarity, difference or contrast between the chosen set of variables. Arriving at logical relationship facilitates to find a reason or come to a valid conclusion. Identifying the cause of the the performance measure increases the ability of the investigator to interpret the data.A number of things. Analysis helps the reader understand the data by describing general trends in the data and pointing out differences and similarities among data points. Interpretation relates data to the objectives they are supposed to measure, explores the relationships between multiple measures of an educational objective, qualifies, amplifies, draws inferences, and evaluates. Analysis and interpretation address questions such as the following: What do the data say about your students’ mastery of subject matter, of research skills, of writing and speaking, and so on? What do the data say about your students’ preparation for taking the next step in their careers? Are there respects in which your students are outstanding? Do they consistently score at the 85th percentile or above on certain subjects in the MFAT? Do they receive high praise from internship supervisors? Are they consistently weak in some respects? Are many of them getting good jobs, being accepted into good medical schools, reporting that they are satisfied with the education they have received from your department? Does their performance on senior capstone projects indicate that the literature research skills of your students are relatively weak? Are there areas where their performance is adequate but undistinguished--where you would like to see a higher level of performance? An attempt to address such questions through analysis and interpretation is an essential piece of any conscientious assessment program.
please mark me as brainliest
Predicting the outcome, observing the output response ans associating meaning to that output is known as interpretation. Interpretation is making the numerical data (numbers) speak. Giving importance to language spoken by the numbers and providing appropriate and sufficient is useful during performance measure.
During performance measure if comparison is made, one can identify the similarity, difference or contrast between the chosen set of variables. Arriving at logical relationship facilitates to find a reason or come to a valid conclusion. Identifying the cause of the the performance measure increases the ability of the investigator to interpret the data.A number of things. Analysis helps the reader understand the data by describing general trends in the data and pointing out differences and similarities among data points. Interpretation relates data to the objectives they are supposed to measure, explores the relationships between multiple measures of an educational objective, qualifies, amplifies, draws inferences, and evaluates. Analysis and interpretation address questions such as the following: What do the data say about your students’ mastery of subject matter, of research skills, of writing and speaking, and so on? What do the data say about your students’ preparation for taking the next step in their careers? Are there respects in which your students are outstanding? Do they consistently score at the 85th percentile or above on certain subjects in the MFAT? Do they receive high praise from internship supervisors? Are they consistently weak in some respects? Are many of them getting good jobs, being accepted into good medical schools, reporting that they are satisfied with the education they have received from your department? Does their performance on senior capstone projects indicate that the literature research skills of your students are relatively weak? Are there areas where their performance is adequate but undistinguished--where you would like to see a higher level of performance? An attempt to address such questions through analysis and interpretation is an essential piece of any conscientious assessment program.
please mark me as brainliest
Similar questions