Question

Difference between Civil Disobedience Movement and Non cooperation 100 words
Do not spam​

Answer 1

Answer:

The non-cooperation and the civil disobedience movements were landmark moments during  India’s independence struggle. Both played a key role in ensuring that India’s independence from British rule was guaranteed on 15th August 1947 and both were the brainchild of Mahatma Gandhi.

Although both the movements had the complete independence of India in mind, the manner in which they were executed and the methodology employed were remarkably different.

The non-cooperation movement sought the attention of the British colonial authorities by bringing the government to a standstill.  

The civil disobedience movement sought to paralyze the government by breaking a specific set of rules and administration.

Non-cooperation  

Civil-Disobedience

It was launched on  September 5th, 1920 it ended on 5th February 1922 It began on March 12, 1930, through the launch of the Salt Satyagraha

The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration. The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules & regulations.

There was large scale participation of Muslim working class in the Non-Cooperation movement The Civil-Disobedience movement saw less participation from the Muslim community due to the policy of divide and rule by the British and the communal propaganda of the Muslim League and the Hindu Mahasabha

The non-cooperation movement was geographically confined to certain parts of India The civil disobedience movement saw widespread geographical coverage and mass participation in comparison to the non-cooperation movement

The movement was called off in 1922 due to the Chauri-Chaura incident  (Occured on Feb 5th, 1922) The movement was withdrawn after the signing of the Gandhi-Irwin pact

Explanation:

hope it helps