difference between debate , extempore and symposium???
whoever gives the appropriate ans will b mark as a brainliest
Answers
Debate is a prepared speech by the speaker who speaks either for the motion or again the motion. Eg- let a topic be technology. Nd 10 persons are there, few will speak on advantages of technology(for the motion) and few will speak on disadvantages of technology (against the motion).
Extempore is spoken without any preparation. That is, on the spot.
Symposium is a meeting held to discuss a particular subject. Eg- govt can anytime call a meeting for important problems and it's solutions. All the ministers will attend the meeting and exchange their ideas and at the end they will reach at a particular conclusion which will be beneficial for the public.
Hope it helps.
Thanks.
Answer:
Explanation:
While a debate and a symposium share many similarities, a debate is an intentional endeavor by participants to "win" the discussion, whereas a symposium is typically a friendly, convivial exchange of ideas.
Both a symposium and a debate can be extremely formal, with participants preparing their speeches in advance, but a symposium is more focused on ideas and information than a debate is on arguments.
Consider a symposium as a forum for the exchange of ideas or as a chance to develop a concept. Consider a discussion as an effort to persuade an audience that a particular idea or notion is correct (or incorrect).
For instance, if two sides (and there may be more than two sides) in a debate hold opposing views on the question of whether or not big government is increasingly invading the privacy of regular citizens, each side would make an effort to assemble convincing arguments to support their position, with the opportunity, of course, to refute the arguments of the other side.
Although it happens occasionally, in a properly formal and serious argument, there should be a clear winner and clear loser.
The purpose of coming together in a symposium of, say, university professors is to share information so that everyone who attends might profit from it. Although there aren't always victors and losers in a symposia, one person can be singled out as a particularly engaging speaker, especially if they made a significant contribution to the symposium's topic or theme.
Similar to the previous example, some presenters might be thought to have shared nothing truly valuable by the audience, and audience members may feel free to gently chastise the presenter who is, so to speak, just repeating the party line during and after the symposium.
Finally, given that both events take place in the marketplace of ideas, regardless of the size of the venue, debates and symposiums can be extremely comparable. But, at least in theory, they have a very different reason for being.
#SPJ3