difference between india and other countries in secularism
Answers
Answered by
0
a variety of wars, the potency of Indian secularism was examined. Through time Kashmir has come to be a symbol in addition to evaluation of Indian secularism. Secular answers were granted to Punjab terrorism (because of communal politics) in 1966. Nehru, in the point embraced few fundamentals rules for managing militant agitations and their needs. To begin with, no discussion or governmental transactions with all the leaders of a motion or approval of their requirements, if they’d secessionist trends, should they took recourse to violence or predicated on their motion or needs on faith or communalism.
From time to time, Indian secularism can be criticized for being Anti-religious, but this is really not true, since it’s contrary to institutionalised spiritual domination. It’s also stated that it boosts Minoritism, but it just advocates minority rights provided that these rights protect their basic interests. It’s also criticized for being Interventionist, meaning that secularism is coercive and it contrasts too with the spiritual freedom of communities.
But this is misread since Indian secularism allows state-supported spiritual reforms. Personal legislation could be reformed in this manner that they are still portray both minority rights and equality between women and men. However, such reform must neither be caused by group or state coercion nor should the state adopt a policy of overall space from it. The country needs to act as a facilitator by encouraging democratic and liberal voices within each faith
It was likewise criticized as an Impossible project by other countries, but India maintained this untrue. In reality, migration is rising because of globalisation and it’s creating scenario where Indian version is quite much desirable. Europe, America, and several elements of Middle East have started to resemble India from the diversity of religions and cultures that are found in their own societies. These societies are observing the future of the Indian experimentation with keen attention for a way for their culture.
Secularism in different nations like Bangladesh is quite unique, which includes Islam as a state religion and secularismas among the fundamental tenets of this Constitution.
The country even encourages”normal” spiritual activity (e.g., maybe not utilizing temples as a platform to preach rhetoric or violence against the country ) because of force for the equilibrium of China
I hope help u
From time to time, Indian secularism can be criticized for being Anti-religious, but this is really not true, since it’s contrary to institutionalised spiritual domination. It’s also stated that it boosts Minoritism, but it just advocates minority rights provided that these rights protect their basic interests. It’s also criticized for being Interventionist, meaning that secularism is coercive and it contrasts too with the spiritual freedom of communities.
But this is misread since Indian secularism allows state-supported spiritual reforms. Personal legislation could be reformed in this manner that they are still portray both minority rights and equality between women and men. However, such reform must neither be caused by group or state coercion nor should the state adopt a policy of overall space from it. The country needs to act as a facilitator by encouraging democratic and liberal voices within each faith
It was likewise criticized as an Impossible project by other countries, but India maintained this untrue. In reality, migration is rising because of globalisation and it’s creating scenario where Indian version is quite much desirable. Europe, America, and several elements of Middle East have started to resemble India from the diversity of religions and cultures that are found in their own societies. These societies are observing the future of the Indian experimentation with keen attention for a way for their culture.
Secularism in different nations like Bangladesh is quite unique, which includes Islam as a state religion and secularismas among the fundamental tenets of this Constitution.
The country even encourages”normal” spiritual activity (e.g., maybe not utilizing temples as a platform to preach rhetoric or violence against the country ) because of force for the equilibrium of China
I hope help u
Similar questions