difference between local history and region?
Answers
It incorporates cultural and social aspects of history. Local history is not merely national history writ small but a study of past events in a given geographical but one that is based on a wide variety of documentary evidence and placed in a comparative context that is both regional and national.
HOPE IT HELPS
PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST ☺️
Answer:
LOCAL HISTORY:-Local history is the study of history in a geographically local context and it often concentrates on the local community. It incorporates cultural and social aspects of history. Local history is not merely national history writ small but a study of past events in a given geographical but one that is based on a wide variety of documentary evidence and placed in a comparative context that is both regional and national.
REGIONAL HISTORY:-Regional history emerges as a good supplement that gives specificity to the great historical processes. At the beginning of the 20th century, the mentioned school proposed to study the history of humanity from large social and economic processes rather than through specific dates or the work of great men. However, this historical trend presented some wear around the middle of the 20th century, especially in what makes the specific study of certain realities on which there was too much information or answers. So emerges the Regional history as an academic stream within the same school of Annales, always renewing and advanced.