Question

Difference between love is not only about romance and romance is not the only form of love ​

Answer 1

Answer:

passive and active forms..

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:

Romance and loving, interesting topics indeed.  Romans is usually a temporary condition that is linked to early dating, getting to know another, and testing

what the limits are in the relationship.  This is the actual period that might be called the honeymoon respite, where neither pf the parties wishes for the other person to see their faults, small or larger, never large.  Picture two dancers mincing around each other, moving closer then spinning away in a solo dance that says I'm really

unavailable.  Romance is a game invented for the social elite at a much earlier time in other countries, when bathing was considered unhealthy and body odors were

smothered by extraordinary perfumes, expensive and rare.  Powdered wigs, high  waste trousers, and  expensive hand  made coats were the custom at balls or dances

favored by the elite of society.  Poety, music, the arts in all forms reflected on the

unattainable, virgin bride pursued by swarms of romantically  inspired men, polite, proper but insistent.  

It was definitely a far cry from the kitchen girls and cow maids who might be greeted with:  Have a leg up, dearie!  If a baby resulted an impromptu wedding

was the result.

Of course loving is considered the objective of close relationships in families and

other couples who are married.  Loving implies long held trust that the order and

familiarity of the home and hearth will be protected from outside intrusion, such

as a suitor who has devious intentions in mind.  It was, and still is in some quarters

a goal to be gone after vigorously, if not aggressively and woe to the interloper who

dares violate the sanctity of a loving relationship.  Of course it isn't all that complicated these days with rapid world communications, both heads of household

out there meeting all these potential, beautiful mating opportunities,  We are still, however, informed of relationships lasting 40 -50 years or more, were they in fact, loving?  Were they held together by the kids, what the family would  think, certainly not by example of the religions example we see today.  We want to believe that

these partnerships are loving, and some of them must be.  Patience, kindness,

hard work, listening, and even obeying when it seems you should are all part of loving.  A dying young man with cancer,  whose wife ministered to him until the end, changed  diapers, fed by spoon his food and medicine, and was there, holding him for his last breath and encouraging him, is an example of loving someone

enough to overlook the raw reality of life ending, and then go on, get three kids off to school, through smiling tears is an extraordinary woman named Lori, who never protested but moved on.  And she still is today.

Hope it helps.