Question

Difference between means of knowledge and sources of knowledge

Answer 1

It’s time we had a serious rethink about “learning.” Chief learning officers have spent decades focused on it—heck, it’s the middle word in their title. But is this where the emphasis should be?

Let’s take a look at the definition: According to Merriam-Webster, learning is the process of studying, teaching, and education. It’s centered on the delivery of information; in the corporate world, that means how to get information to an employee, which often translates to classroom-based instruction, a learning management system, or blended approaches. Simple enough…

When you look closer, though, there’s a key component missing. Business success doesn’t result from learning; it results from sales, or customer service, or even just having your team get home safely after each shift. To achieve these outcomes, employees need to have the right knowledge. Learning is simply the means of acquiring knowledge, and that distinction is key.

Answer 2

Answer:

Some of the sources of knowledge are:

It distinguishes the “four standard basic sources”: perception, memory, consciousness, and reason. A basic source yields knowledge or justified belief without positive dependence on another source. This article distinguishes each of the above as a basic source of knowledge, with the exception of memory.

While on the other hand-

Means of knowledge are:

During this progression, four types of knowledge are developed: declarative, procedural, contextual, and somatic. Declarative knowledge contains domain-related facts and concepts, often centered on the ability to verbalize a given fact.

Hope this helps...