difference between monarchy and republican
Answers
Answer:
If you mean constitutional monarchy, then as both are representative democracies, the difference is elected versus hereditary heads of state.
In a republic the head of state is elected somehow, whether that be popularly or through some other mechanism such as the legislature or an electoral college. A constitutional monarchy has a hereditary head of state in the form of a monarch, such as a king, queen, prince, or duke.
The powers of either head of state will vary by country, especially amongst republics depending on whether they are presidential, semi-presidential, or parliamentary.
The president of a presidential republic will have the most power as he is also head of government. This would be like the US, Brazil, Mexico, and most other Western Hemisphere countries. The presidents with the fewest powers will be in parliamentary republics like Germany, Italy, Israel, Iceland, and Ireland. (It must be an I-country thing.).
Constitutional monarch powers will also vary. Jordan is technically a constitutional monarchy, but the king retains most of the power because it’s not ready to transition. In Europe, not counting the Vatican (a non-hereditary monarchy), the Prince of Liechtenstein has the the most relative power, whilst the King of Sweden has the least, being the only European monarch constitutionally limited to a figurehead role, like the a Emperor of Japan.
the major difference between republic and monarchy is the fact that a monarchy is ruled by a monarch example king or queen , where as in Republic, the people choose who they want to rule them.
please mark it as brainliest