Difference between national emergency and president rule
Answers
Answered by
0
It is a good question....
Your answer is as follows
_______
****
NATIONAL EMERGENCY:-
1)It can be proclaimed only when the security of India or a part of it is threatened by war, external aggression or armed rebellion.
2)Under this, the Parliament can make laws on the subjects enumerated in the State List only by itself,that is, it cannot delegate the same to any other body or authority.
3)There is no maximum period prescribed for its operation.
It can be continued indefinitely with the approval of Parliament for every six months
4)Under this, the relationship of the Centre with all the states undergoes a modification
5)It affects fundamental rights of the citizens.
President’s Rule
1)It can be proclaimed when the government of a state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution due to reasons which may not have any connection with war, external aggression or armed rebellion.
2)Under this, the Parliament can delegate the power to make laws for the state to the President or to any other authority specified by him.
So far,the practice has been for the president to make laws for the state in consultation with the members of Parliament from that state.
Such laws are known as President’s Acts.
3)There is a maximum period prescribed for its operation, that is, three years.
Thereafter, it must come to an end and the normal constitutional machinery must be restored in the state.
4)Under this, the relationship of only the state under emergency with the Centre undergoes a modification
5)It has no effect on Fundamental Rights of the citizens.
HOPE IT HELPS***:-)
Your answer is as follows
_______
****
NATIONAL EMERGENCY:-
1)It can be proclaimed only when the security of India or a part of it is threatened by war, external aggression or armed rebellion.
2)Under this, the Parliament can make laws on the subjects enumerated in the State List only by itself,that is, it cannot delegate the same to any other body or authority.
3)There is no maximum period prescribed for its operation.
It can be continued indefinitely with the approval of Parliament for every six months
4)Under this, the relationship of the Centre with all the states undergoes a modification
5)It affects fundamental rights of the citizens.
President’s Rule
1)It can be proclaimed when the government of a state cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution due to reasons which may not have any connection with war, external aggression or armed rebellion.
2)Under this, the Parliament can delegate the power to make laws for the state to the President or to any other authority specified by him.
So far,the practice has been for the president to make laws for the state in consultation with the members of Parliament from that state.
Such laws are known as President’s Acts.
3)There is a maximum period prescribed for its operation, that is, three years.
Thereafter, it must come to an end and the normal constitutional machinery must be restored in the state.
4)Under this, the relationship of only the state under emergency with the Centre undergoes a modification
5)It has no effect on Fundamental Rights of the citizens.
HOPE IT HELPS***:-)
Similar questions