Social Sciences, asked by anushakum12, 10 months ago

difference between natural and physical features

Answers

Answered by siddhantbisht32
0

Answer:

Hecataeus gave more weight to physical geography, while Herodotus and Strabo emphasized the human aspect. Dualism of physical versus human geography is still a characteristic of the discipline. Some writers have regarded it as essential for the justification of the role of geography, while others have argued for it as also for a division of the subject into physical and human geography on the ground that the respective methodologies of physical and human geography must be different.

In studies of natural phenomena, including climatology, meteorology, hydrology, oceanography, geology and landforms, it is possible to use the methods of natural sciences and to draw conclusions with a large measure of scientific precision. The methods of natural science, however, do not lend themselves very well to the study of social and cultural phenomena. Our generalization about human groups must be limited in time and space, and must relate to statements of probability rather than certainty.

Verenius, whose Geographia Generalis was published Amsterdam in 1650, was one of the first scholars to suggest the essential differences in the characteristics of physical and human geography. At the beginning of the 18th century, Immanuel Kant delivered lectures on physical geography at the University of Konigsburg (Germany). He studied the deflection of wind direction resulting from earth’s rotation

Answered by ButterFliee
0

Answer:

natural features => the characters given by the nature or naturally

physical features=> the characters which are given to object only external outlook

Similar questions